I haven't tested it much beyond self hosting and targeted test cases.
================
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/zero-length-arrays.cpp:13
@@ -13,5 +12,3 @@
int foo_count;
- Foo foos[0];
- Foo foos2[0][2];
- Foo foos3[2][0];
+ Foo foos[0]; // expected-error-re {{flexible array member {{.*}} with
non-trivial destruction}}
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> Can we find out what rdar://problem/10228639 was?
> interaction between having a trailing zero-sized array in a struct (C++
> extension) and whether that implies having a default constructor.
> the usual sort of thing. language extension interaction w/ actual language
> standard. things get odd.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5478
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
