I wanted to apply your suggestion about skip functions, but stumbled upon a new
problem: how should we handle macros when searching for brace location (in skip
function)?
They are not expanded on the moment when clang-tidy runs over the file, so how
can I expand them to check if they're empty?
I tried `Token::hasLeadingEmptyMacro()`, but it doesn't work as I expected.
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/misc-braces-around-statements.cpp:179
@@ +178,3 @@
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-5]]:38: warning: statement should be inside
braces
+ // CHECK-FIXES: if (1) { while (2) { if (3) { for (;;) { do { ; }
while(false) /**/;
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: }
----------------
alexfh wrote:
> What happens with the comment that was after the semicolon? Could you please
> add it to the appropriate check line?
I deleted it somehow. Restored.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5395
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
