After requests on IRC, it seems people prefer to make -fmodules turn on C++ modules now rather than waiting until closer to 3.6; that's done in r218717.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we'll be ready to do this for Clang 3.6. I don't have strong > feelings about whether we should do this now or wait until we've had more > time for testing and bug fixes, though. > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Vassil Vassilev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> That is pretty cool! Does this mean we could merge fcxx-modules into >> fmodules flags? >> Vassil >> >> On 09/29/2014 07:46 PM, Richard Smith wrote: >> >>> Author: rsmith >>> Date: Mon Sep 29 12:46:41 2014 >>> New Revision: 218614 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=218614&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Update modules documentation now that C++ support is working pretty well. >>> >>> Modified: >>> cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst >>> >>> Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/docs/ >>> Modules.rst?rev=218614&r1=218613&r2=218614&view=diff >>> ============================================================ >>> ================== >>> --- cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst (original) >>> +++ cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst Mon Sep 29 12:46:41 2014 >>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Objective-C provides syntax for importin >>> @import std; >>> -The @import declaration above imports the entire contents of the >>> ``std`` module (which would contain, e.g., the entire C or C++ standard >>> library) and make its API available within the current translation unit. To >>> import only part of a module, one may use dot syntax to specific a >>> particular submodule, e.g., >>> +The ``@import`` declaration above imports the entire contents of the >>> ``std`` module (which would contain, e.g., the entire C or C++ standard >>> library) and make its API available within the current translation unit. To >>> import only part of a module, one may use dot syntax to specific a >>> particular submodule, e.g., >>> .. parsed-literal:: >>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ Command-line parameters >>> Enable the modules feature (EXPERIMENTAL). >>> ``-fcxx-modules`` >>> - Enable the modules feature for C++ (EXPERIMENTAL and VERY BROKEN). >>> + Enable the modules feature for C++ (EXPERIMENTAL). >>> ``-fmodule-maps`` >>> Enable interpretation of module maps (EXPERIMENTAL). This option is >>> implied by ``-fmodules``. >>> @@ -832,14 +832,11 @@ Modules is an experimental feature, and >>> Unlike with ``#include`` directives, it should be fairly simple to >>> track whether a directly-imported module has ever been used. By doing so, >>> Clang can emit ``unused import`` or ``unused #include`` diagnostics, >>> including Fix-Its to remove the useless imports/includes. >>> **Fix-Its for missing imports** >>> - It's fairly common for one to make use of some API while writing >>> code, only to get a compiler error about "unknown type" or "no function >>> named" because the corresponding header has not been included. Clang should >>> detect such cases and auto-import the required module (with a Fix-It!). >>> + It's fairly common for one to make use of some API while writing >>> code, only to get a compiler error about "unknown type" or "no function >>> named" because the corresponding header has not been included. Clang can >>> detect such cases and auto-import the required module, but should provide a >>> Fix-It to add the import. >>> **Improve modularize** >>> The modularize tool is both extremely important (for deployment) and >>> extremely crude. It needs better UI, better detection of problems >>> (especially for C++), and perhaps an assistant mode to help write module >>> maps for you. >>> -**C++ Support** >>> - Modules clearly has to work for C++, or we'll never get to use it for >>> the Clang code base. >>> - >>> Where To Learn More About Modules >>> ================================= >>> The Clang source code provides additional information about modules: >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cfe-commits mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
