>>! In D5577#18, @sbenza wrote: > It is still bad that it allocates more than 300k of heap, and then it doesn't > even use most of it.
It's ~90k of heap (after changing unsigned to unsigned char). But if you'll manage to get a decent implementation of (4), it would be nice. I'll leave this patch here in case there is no better solution. > I have a prototype of (4) at http://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/14336/ > Haven't benchmarked it yet. http://reviews.llvm.org/D5577 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
