On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Larisse Voufo <[email protected]> wrote:
> This qualifier seems to have been added accidentally. (It is the only > occurrence of basic_ostream within the same file that is qualified). > > I have been having a bit of trouble building libc++ successfully; and even > when I got that done, I have been unable to run the regression tests > successfully. So, I have not been able to verify that the changes I > suggested in the attached patch won't break anything. > > That said, it'd be great to have someone take a look and apply it. > Does this extra qualification break any conforming code, or just code that tries to forward-declare basic_ostream?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
