On Oct 3, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > But a bigger question is if there is objection to having this kind of > > potentially noisy warning? There will be projects which break and patch > > gets reverted. > > I think it's fine if it's done right. I don't think the current approach is > viable. > > I don’t quite understand “current approach". You mean this particular warning after ‘final’ you are objecting to? or reverting a patch because of new warnings. - Fariborz > > > > - Fariborz > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
