================
Comment at: bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py:260
@@ +259,3 @@
+
+    found = False
+    for foo in foos:
----------------
Since you're really only looking for one cursor for 'foo' here, maybe this loop 
can be simplified away? I.g. no need for 'found' etc. The test and its kin can 
be made shorter

================
Comment at: bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py:264
@@ +263,3 @@
+        found = True
+        num_template_args = foo.get_num_template_arguments()
+        assert num_template_args == 3
----------------
Just:

  assert foo.get_num_template_arguments() == 3

?

================
Comment at: bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py:287
@@ +286,3 @@
+        found = True
+        assert ctypes.c_int(foo.get_template_argument_value(0)).value == -7
+        assert ctypes.c_bool(foo.get_template_argument_value(2)).value == True
----------------
Why the ctypes casts here?

================
Comment at: include/clang-c/Index.h:2947
@@ +2946,3 @@
+ */
+CINDEX_LINKAGE int clang_Cursor_getNumTemplateArguments(CXCursor C);
+
----------------
Since this is all only for function decls that are specializations, IMHO the 
comment should mention this. A small code sample could help too

================
Comment at: tools/libclang/CXCursor.cpp:1091
@@ +1090,3 @@
+    assert(0 && "NULL FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo retrieved");
+    return 0;
+  }
----------------
Why 0 and not -1 here?

http://reviews.llvm.org/D5621



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to