================
Comment at: test/Sema/ms-inline-asm.c:109
@@ -108,3 +108,3 @@
__declspec(naked) int t5(int x) { // expected-note {{attribute is here}}
- asm { movl eax, x } // expected-error {{parameter references not allowed in
naked functions}} expected-error {{use of undeclared label 'x'}}
+ asm { movl eax, x } // expected-error {{parameter references not allowed in
naked functions}} expected-error {{use of undeclared label 'x'}} expected-error
{{cannot use inline assembly label 'x' defined outside of an inline assembly
block}}
asm { retl }
----------------
ehsan wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > Hm, this diagnostic is pretty bad. :( We should try returning the found
> > declaration even when we generate the first diagnostic to suppress these
> > follow on diagnostics.
> Can I do that in a separate patch? It's only tangentially related to this
> change.
Yeah.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5694
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
