================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/CMakeLists.txt:18
@@ -20,2 +17,3 @@
   clangTidy
+  clangTidyReadability
   )
----------------
djasper wrote:
> Hm. I understand that you don't want to create a separate readability at this 
> point. But leave a comment here, otherwise the layering seems quite confusing.
Done.

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/BracesAroundStatementsCheck.h:10
@@ -9,3 +9,3 @@
 
-#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_MISC_BRACES_AROUND_STATEMENTS_CHECK_H
-#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_MISC_BRACES_AROUND_STATEMENTS_CHECK_H
+#ifndef 
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_READABILITY_BRACESAROUNDSTATEMENTSCHECK_H
+#define 
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_READABILITY_BRACESAROUNDSTATEMENTSCHECK_H
----------------
djasper wrote:
> Not sure whether this is allowed/desired for LLVM style, but we should fix 
> the comment on the #endif accordingly.
Yeah, the llvm-header-guard check should at least fix existing comments if not 
add new ones. Its current behavior is slightly harmful.

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/FunctionSize.h:48
@@ -45,2 +47,2 @@
 
 #endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_MISC_FUNCTIONSIZE_H
----------------
djasper wrote:
> Fix comment.
Fixed #endif comments.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D5792



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to