On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:06 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi echristo, dblaikie, > > To follow-up on this thread on cfe-dev: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-October/039649.html > > -g1 on gcc (and also IBM's xlc) are documented to be very similar to > -gline-tables-only. Our -gline-tables-only might still be more verbose than > -g1 on other compilers, but currently we treat -g1 as -g, and so we're > producing much more debug info at -g1 than everybody else. Treating -g1 as > -gline-tables-only brings us much closer to what everyone else is doing. > A follow-up: which user(s) did you have who hit problems with -g1? Do you know what /they/ want when they specify -g1? It'd be useful to at least have some actual user of -g1 with a documented use case so we know if we're meeting their needs, etc. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D5862 > > Files: > lib/Driver/Tools.cpp > test/Driver/debug-options.c >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
