r211657 made it easier to support newlib, makes the interface clang provides more uniform (there are already similar macros), and more compatible with GCC. I'd argue they're standard macros because of their naming :-)
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected] > wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 07:02:01PM -0400, Aaron Ballman wrote: > > I have a very slight preference for (1) over (2) -- I don't see the > > benefit to guaranteeing those nonstandard macros as being part of > > Clang's interface. > > Supporting char vs unsigned char gets messy without out. > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
