I'm saying we might want to verify that these do in fact fail. UNSUPPORTED causes the test to not be run, XFAIL tests to ensure failure, which is possibly what we want here. OTOH, our test configuration isn't set up to do conditional _compile time_ failures, so maybe we should just settle for UNSUPPORTED. On Oct 23, 2014 8:25 PM, "Eric Fiselier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you saying that if we plan to support <atomic> in C++03 we should mark > them as XFAIL? I don't think <atomic> will ever be supported below c++11, > hence the use of <atomic> in c++03 is "unsupported". > > Let me know if I didn't understand anything. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D5955 > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
