On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Nifty! But do you think this is cheap enough for a general compiler >> > warning? It certainly doesn't depend on the analyzer's path-sensitive >> > analysis, so it's mostly just how much we care about the cost of >> > isDerivedFrom. >> >> This should be relatively inexpensive, so it may make sense as a >> general compiler warning if others feel that's a better approach. > > > Yes, I think this is a good candidate for an (on-by-default) compiler > warning.
Then I'll rework this, thanks! ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
