>>! In D6041#9, @ehsan wrote: >>>! In D6041#7, @hans wrote: >> Do we really want to try supporting the individual MSVC warning flags? >> >> It will never be a clean mapping anyway, and the diagnostics won't be very >> nice. For example, Clang won't print the MSVC style warning names when >> issuing a warning. >> >> Can't you just use the same list of enabled/disabled warning that you use >> with Clang on other platforms? > > Yeah, I suppose we could do that... Should we can this patch, then?
I'd be in favor of that. I think we should certainly support the broad flags, like turning all warnings off, treating them as errors, etc. But for controlling individual Clang warnings, I think it makes sense to use Clang flags. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6041 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
