I don't think we should change our behavior w.r.t. static locals of non-inline
functions. This behavior should stay the same:
void f() {
if (0) {
static int a = 0;
}
static int a = 0; // _ZZ1fvE1a
}
inline void f() {
if (0) {
static int a = 0;
}
static int a = 0; // _ZZ1fvE1a_0
}
The reason is that in the non-inline case, we don't want to waste time during
Sema building up tables on the ASTContext. The name is not ABI relevant, and
either name is as good as the next.
I agree with your assessment of the static local union case, though. It's not
clear to me how your fix works, but maybe -ast-dump isn't complete enough for
me to see the IndirectFieldDecl that you're finding.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6295
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
