> Should we really assert that va_copy is *never* defined before C++11?
> That seems contrary to other requirements like POSIX.

I got a bit overzealous in the tests. I'll remove the extra check after
double checking the C++11 requirements.

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]
> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:46:18PM -0000, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=222282&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Modify tests to check that va_copy is only defined in C++11 and beyond.
>
> Should we really assert that va_copy is *never* defined before C++11?
> That seems contrary to other requirements like POSIX.
>
> Joerg
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to