================
Comment at: clang-tidy/google/ExplicitConstructorCheck.cpp:93
@@ -66,3 +92,3 @@
DiagnosticBuilder Diag =
- diag(Ctor->getLocation(), "%0 constructor declared explicit.")
- << (Ctor->isMoveConstructor() ? "Move" : "Copy");
+ diag(Ctor->getLocation(), "%0 constructor declared explicit")
+ << ConstructorDescription;
----------------
djasper wrote:
> Maybe make this call for action more, e.g. "%0 constructor must not be
> declared explicit".
Changed the message to "X should not be declared explicit" to match the Style
Guide wording.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6427
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
