Yeah, it is not useful to have an instance with such a high failure rate. I need our bots to be announcing failures over IRC or email, and we can’t do that with a server that fails daily. It was also losing lots of data points by failing.
I agree that we should use a common server. I will migrate the green dragon performance data to a communal server when we have a reliable instance. I’ll see if I can find a more suitable solution after the break. > On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:18 PM, Tobias Grosser <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 26.11.2014 00:30, Chris Matthews wrote: >> I don’t have access to that server. >> >> I have been using a cloud LNT instance for the performance runs on the >> green-dragon cluster. So far it has provided 100% uptime! >> >> http://llvm-lnt.herokuapp.com <http://llvm-lnt.herokuapp.com/> > > I am surprised. What was the reason you did not use the instance at > llvm.org/perf? Did you consider it broken? > > If the only issue was that you did not have server access, then maybe we > should fix this. I do not see why we would maintain two instances. > One canonical address for LLVM performance results seems to be the way to go. > > Cheers, > Tobias > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
