Sorry, it seems I'm reading email in the wrong order today.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:4745
@@ -4744,1 +4744,3 @@
if (MD->isUserProvided()) {
+ // Don't mark constexpr functions again
+ if (MD->isConstexpr())
----------------
ehsan wrote:
> hans wrote:
> > The comment is a little vague (and should end with a period). Maybe
> > something like "constexpr functions are already marked referenced."
> >
> > Also, David pointed out that this does not only apply to user-defined
> > functions, so it should be moved back to where you first suggested in the
> > PR. Sorry for my misleading suggestion here before.
> What about http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21718#c6?
Maybe what we should do is something like
if (MD->isReferenced())
continue;
Would that pass all the old tests and your new one?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6528
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
