In http://reviews.llvm.org/D6259#101418, @ABataev wrote:
> > I'm thinking we should probably split the rename of refersToEnclosingLocal > > -> refersToCapturedVariable into a separate patch, though. > > > I think we should keep it in this patch, because we're changing the meaning > of this flag. We're expanding the meaning of the flag. It's good to stage changes like this — it means that you can say definitively that the larger and more invasive-looking patch is a non-functional change, which is really useful for people reviewing the commit history. Please do this; I know it's a little annoying to do it after you've already got a unified patch, but it's the right thing to do. If you split it, it looks ready to go. http://reviews.llvm.org/D6259 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits