On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Nico Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that off by default warnings are a "warning smell". But this doesn't > look like a warning that's supposed to find bugs, it's more a language > compliance thing, like -pedantic. Maybe it should be an ExtWarn. But is > someone is actively implementing the suggested heuristics, we can wait and > see how they do first, I suppose.
I could agree that it should perhaps be treated under -pedantic, but have no strong feelings. > For the "final(a,b,c)" define: should we warn on that? It doesn't change the > meaning of the keyword "final" since that doesn't have parameters. Doesn't have parameters *today* -- it's still a reserved keyword for the language. ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
