The idea is that we don't need any kind of exit at all. The problem is totally catchable at Sema-time; we should be giving the user a fancy diagnostic with carets, etc.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> This can be handled much better at the Sema level; thanks to majnemer for >> pointing that out. >> > > It should still be an assert or llvm_report_fatal_error, or something > other than a direct call to 'exit'. > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
