Recommitted in r225956
Hope that helps (do let me know if it doesn't, of course) On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:54 AM, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Ulrich Weigand < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote on 13.01.2015 20:47:36: >> >> > Thanks, sorry for the breakage. >> > >> > It looks like this is fixed by re-applying my patches to rework all >> > this location stuff >> ( http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=225555&view=rev >> > ) - which has a few other bugs I'm trying to figure out before >> recommitting. >> > >> > Sorry for the breakage. We can go back further & revert more >> > patches, or hopefully wait another day or two if I can ignore email >> > long enough to fix the remaining issues with that work. >> >> Thanks for looking into this! >> >> I'm fine with waiting a couple of days; however, I understand LLVM 3.6 >> is going to branch tomorrow, and this regression seems serious enough >> that it really ought to be fixed on the branch as well (one way or >> the other) ... >> > > Fair point - will try to get something sorted by then. Feel free to > ping/throw things at me/etc if I don't & we'll integrate something into the > branch. > > - David > > >> >> Bye, >> Ulrich >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
