On 1/20/2015 4:24 PM, Sameer Sahasrabuddhe wrote:
On 1/20/2015 4:16 PM, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Alexander Kornienko
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Added: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenOpenCL/spir-calling-conv.cl
<http://spir-calling-conv.cl>
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenOpenCL/spir-calling-conv.cl?rev=226548&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenOpenCL/spir-calling-conv.cl
<http://spir-calling-conv.cl> (added)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenOpenCL/spir-calling-conv.cl
<http://spir-calling-conv.cl> Tue Jan 20 00:44:32 2015
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple "spir-unknown-unknown"
-emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+int get_dummy_id(int D);
+
+kernel void bar(global int *A);
+
+kernel void foo(global int *A)
+// CHECK: define spir_kernel void @foo(i32 addrspace(1)* %A)
+{
+ int id = get_dummy_id(0);
+ // CHECK: %call = tail call spir_func i32 @get_dummy_id(i32 0)
This test fails
<http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-configure-Rlto_check/1183/>.
Please fix or revert.
Clarification: this test fails only in some configurations, thus it
doesn't look like a trivial typo in the test which I could fix myself.
This is blocking us, so I'm going to revert the revision.
Okay, go ahead, then. Looking into it.
I just had a look, and the failure looks trivial. The test looks for
"%call" as the name of the call instruction, but that particular config
seems to produce an anonymous value. Could you retry with a different
pattern in the test? It will be hard to test this on my machine.
Sameer.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
