How did the compiler produce constraints like `=&&r` in the initial version of this patch? Might the `CodeGenFunction::EmitAsmStmt` be called twice?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7346 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
