Ping

> On Jan 26, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Ben Langmuir <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This patch diagnoses a missing ‘typename’ keyword on nested template types 
> like A<T>::B<U>, to fix llvm.org/pr16909 <http://llvm.org/pr16909>. In 
> addition to fixing an accepts-invalid, in C++11 such types would cause 
> assertion failures and/or invalid LLVM IR when used with ‘auto’.
> 
> I’m not 100% sure if the changes to 
> test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.qual/class.qual/p2.cpp are 
> desirable, or if we should suppress the missing ‘typename’ diagnostic when 
> we’re already recovering on X<T>::X<T>.  I’m open to suggestions :-)
> 
> Ben
> 
> <pr16909.patch>

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to