Circling back to this incremental parsing. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Vassil Vassilev <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason we went for IncrementalProcessing is that it does more than just > parsing, it allows clang to be able to continue working even upon seeing an > EOF token.
Right. > Could you also add a test case maybe closer to your planned use-case? It's actually somewhat difficult because it requires a lot of infrastructure to get there. The short version is that ParseAST doesn't allow me to modify the preprocessor before it starts parsing. But from a functionality perspective, nothing should be different than it is today. Whatever test cases exist should cover the functionality present. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Axel Naumann <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, that's so much nicer! Thanks! OK to check in? Sterling _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
