On 2015-03-10 15:31, Howard Hinnant wrote:
On Mar 7, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Oleg Smolsky <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi there, I reported a TSan issue that resulted in the following bug report
against libc++:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22836
Could you folks take a look at the following (intuitive) patch please?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8147
Thanks!
Oleg.
Can the increment be relaxed?
http://stackoverflow.com/q/28199212/576911
Hi Howard, my understanding is that the increment path can become:
__shared_owners_.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_acquire);
BTW, does that make any difference on x86-64?
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
