Indeed, I added `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_MONOTONIC_CLOCK` for exactly the situation 
@hfinkel describes: my platform doesn't have access to a monotonic clock. 
Originally (and in my local fork) it had checks for `_POSIX_TIMERS` and 
`_POSIX_MONOTONIC_CLOCK` but those seem to have gone away upstream.

Sorry about the bad name suggestions. I suppose I was conflating the "does it 
have X" checks with the "how should X be implemented" checks. For my platform, 
the latter is irrelevant because the answer to the former is "no". For yours, 
this distinction is more important. Now I see that the naming should reflect 
that.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D8253

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to