On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:57 PM, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Alexander Kornienko <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Author: alexfh >> Date: Wed Mar 11 11:47:27 2015 >> New Revision: 231938 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=231938&view=rev >> Log: >> [clang-tidy] Clean up misc-use-override warning. NFC >> >> Modified: >> clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h >> >> Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h?rev=231938&r1=231937&r2=231938&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h (original) >> +++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h Wed Mar 11 11:47:27 >> 2015 >> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ public: >> assert(!CheckName.empty()); >> } >> >> - virtual ~ClangTidyCheck() {} >> + ~ClangTidyCheck() override = default; >> > > Just remove this, then - since it's the implicit default anyway? > I didn't want to rely on the implementation (that the class derives from another class that has a virtual destructor). Or would I get a warning in case I removed the inheritance?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
