In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8467#143810, @rsmith wrote:
> I have one general concern: we used to provide sized deallocation outside of > C++14 mode via `-Xclang -fiszed-deallocation`. With this patch, that no > longer works, because `-fsized-deallocation` doesn't cause the sized > deallocation functions to get implicitly declared any more. > > Given that the implicit declarations are not really useful unless a sized > deallocation function is known to be available, and that it seems overkill to > have two flags for this feature, perhaps we should keep the implicit > declarations and the usage thereof tied together under the same flag? Makes sense. Doing that actually requires less change. :) http://reviews.llvm.org/D8467 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
