In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8465#144141, @eliben wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8465#144139, @jpienaar wrote: > > > Looks good. Is it better to adjust the range here or n > > ParseCXXInlineMethodDef? > > > The problem with ParseCXXInlineMethodDef is that we no longer have access to > these tokens in it. ParseCXXInlineMethodDef expects to see a { for a def or ; > for a =default/=delete method. So we'd have to push DeleteOrDefaultEndLoc > through to ParseCXXInlineMethodDef - it would result in an additional > argument, more code and I'm not sure what gain. OK, I thought KWLoc that is set in ParseCXXInlineMethodDef could be used to get it. http://reviews.llvm.org/D8465 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
