> > > I'll take a look at the PR to make sure we can just close it. > > So the PR was also about adding options at LTO time to fix code generation. I don't think this is the right way to do it, I think I'd prefer to use the clang machinery rather than -mattr etc. (Which you can do via command line option if the gold plugin calls cl::ParseCommandLineOptions I think...)
-eric > -eric > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:23 PM David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Eric - this sounds related to your recent work. I assume we should be >> producing the same asm, but not by passing any flags to the linker, >> instead >> by using function attributes? >> >> >> REPOSITORY >> rL LLVM >> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D8629 >> >> EMAIL PREFERENCES >> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
