Hi Daniel,

Please always add cfe-commits to CC for all code reviews touching cfe or 
clang-tools-extra repositories.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9079#157602, @danielmarjamaki wrote:

> what is your opinion on this refactoring?


Seems to make things better. A couple of comments inline.

Thanks!


================
Comment at: include/clang/Lex/MacroInfo.h:244
@@ -243,2 +243,3 @@
   bool tokens_empty() const { return ReplacementTokens.empty(); }
+  const SmallVector<Token, 8> &tokens() const { return ReplacementTokens; }
 
----------------
This should return `const SmallVectorImpl<Token> &` to avoid dependency on the 
SmallVector inline storage size.

================
Comment at: lib/Frontend/PrintPreprocessedOutput.cpp:67
@@ -66,4 +66,3 @@
   SmallString<128> SpellingBuffer;
-  for (MacroInfo::tokens_iterator I = MI.tokens_begin(), E = MI.tokens_end();
-       I != E; ++I) {
-    if (I->hasLeadingSpace())
+  for (const clang::Token &T : MI.tokens()) {
+    if (T.hasLeadingSpace())
----------------
There's no need in the `clang::` qualifier here due to the using directive 
above.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D9079

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to