Awesome, Thanks Richard! On 28 April 2015 at 20:11, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Michael Park <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The answer is that we don't really know. It would be more consistent with >>> the non-template case for it to be ill-formed (it also seems reasonable to >>> say that you can't instantiate a member function until its class is >>> complete), but the point of instantiation rules for constexpr functions >>> aren't settled yet; this is part of DR1581 (still open). >>> >> >> Agreed. Thanks for the pointer to DR1581! >> >> LGTM >> >> >> As this is my first patch for Clang, I'm not all that familiar with the >> required process to get this patch committed. Am I required to do anything >> further on my end? >> > > I've committed your patch as r236063. Feel free to go ahead and > mark PR20625 as fixed. Thanks! > > >> Thanks, >> >> MPark. >> > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
