In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8989#173899, @hfinkel wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8989#173894, @spatel wrote: > > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8989#173790, @hfinkel wrote: > > > > > GCC, to combine the x86 and PPC options, accepts the keys all, default, > > > div (for both divf and divd), divf, divd, rsqrt (for both rsqrtf and > > > rsqrtd), rsqrtf, rsqrtd, and then these same things with the 'vec-' > > > prefix. '!' is used as the prefix to indicate disabling (not '-' as you > > > have here). > > > > > > I'm fine with the :<n> syntax extension, but I'd rather use GCC's syntax > > > here as a base for compatibility. > > > > > > Ok - I missed the f/d shortcut. I wasn't sure if compatibility with GCC > > (the '!') trumped the existing enable/disable (+/-) syntax that we use for > > target features. Let me know if we should keep the +/- for the llc > > command-line or switch that to ! as well. > > > I'd rather you keep the llc syntax the same. I realize that's ambiguous. I'd rather the llc syntax match the Clang syntax. http://reviews.llvm.org/D8989 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
