Re: [PATCH] MismatchingNewDeleteDetector uses incorrect field, and finds no initializer

[Ismail Pazarbasi]

Return from `analyzeInClassInitializer`, if in-class initializer is null.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D9898

Files:
  lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
  test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp

Index: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -2487,8 +2487,10 @@
 MismatchingNewDeleteDetector::MismatchResult
 MismatchingNewDeleteDetector::analyzeInClassInitializer() {
   assert(Field != nullptr && "This should be called only for members");
-  if (const CXXNewExpr *NE =
-          getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr(Field->getInClassInitializer())) {
+  const Expr *InitExpr = Field->getInClassInitializer();
+  if (!InitExpr)
+    return EndOfTU ? NoMismatch : AnalyzeLater;
+  if (const CXXNewExpr *NE = getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr(InitExpr)) {
     if (NE->isArray() != IsArrayForm) {
       NewExprs.push_back(NE);
       return MemberInitMismatches;
Index: test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp
+++ test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp
@@ -120,6 +120,22 @@
   DELETE(d);          // expected-warning {{'delete' applied to a pointer that 
was allocated with 'new[]'; did you mean 'delete[]'?}}
 }
 }
+
+namespace MissingInitializer {
+template<typename T>
+struct Base {
+  struct S {
+    const T *p1 = nullptr;
+    const T *p2 = new T[3];
+  };
+};
+
+void null_init(Base<double>::S s) {
+  delete s.p1;
+  delete s.p2;
+}
+}
+
 #ifndef WITH_PCH
 pch_test::X::X()
   : a(new int[1])  // expected-note{{allocated with 'new[]' here}}

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

Index: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -2487,8 +2487,10 @@
 MismatchingNewDeleteDetector::MismatchResult
 MismatchingNewDeleteDetector::analyzeInClassInitializer() {
   assert(Field != nullptr && "This should be called only for members");
-  if (const CXXNewExpr *NE =
-          getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr(Field->getInClassInitializer())) {
+  const Expr *InitExpr = Field->getInClassInitializer();
+  if (!InitExpr)
+    return EndOfTU ? NoMismatch : AnalyzeLater;
+  if (const CXXNewExpr *NE = getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr(InitExpr)) {
     if (NE->isArray() != IsArrayForm) {
       NewExprs.push_back(NE);
       return MemberInitMismatches;
Index: test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp
+++ test/SemaCXX/delete.cpp
@@ -120,6 +120,22 @@
   DELETE(d);          // expected-warning {{'delete' applied to a pointer that was allocated with 'new[]'; did you mean 'delete[]'?}}
 }
 }
+
+namespace MissingInitializer {
+template<typename T>
+struct Base {
+  struct S {
+    const T *p1 = nullptr;
+    const T *p2 = new T[3];
+  };
+};
+
+void null_init(Base<double>::S s) {
+  delete s.p1;
+  delete s.p2;
+}
+}
+
 #ifndef WITH_PCH
 pch_test::X::X()
   : a(new int[1])  // expected-note{{allocated with 'new[]' here}}

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits