On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Majnemer<[email protected]> wrote:
> I misread the rules in 6.5.9 which caused false diagnostic messages.
> The attached patch should correct this issue and also includes updated
> test cases.
@@ -27,5 +29,10 @@
return a > b; // expected-warning {{ordered comparison of function pointers}}
return function_pointers > function_pointers; // expected-warning
{{ordered comparison of function pointers}}
return a == (void *) 0;
- return a == (void *) 1; // expected-warning {{comparison of
distinct pointer types}}
+ return a == (void *) 1;
This warning was correct the way it was.
-Eli
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
