New review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10626
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:40 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > If we do that, we should remove the defensive code from IR-gen, because the > less-defensive code is serving the admirable purpose of detecting this > problem by causing this assertion. > > > REPOSITORY > rL LLVM > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D10508 > > EMAIL PREFERENCES > http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
