On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we have a way to express this in slightly less verbose terms?
I don't think so (or at least, I didn't found a way to do so) -- these are quite distinct checks. > If > not, I think a static helper function would also be reasonable. > Otherwise, LTGTM. OK -- I encapsulated deferred handling of redefine_extern pragma, along with all the checks, in a separate method. Patch updated; please re-review (or accept the patch if you don't see a need for re-review). Yours, Andrey _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
