================ Comment at: test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-method-nodebug.cpp:6 @@ +5,3 @@ + void absent() __attribute__((nodebug)); + int i; +}; ---------------- dblaikie wrote: > do you need the int member? No. I'll take it out. (Leftover from a fatter test that also checked codegen didn't emit any dbg annotations in a definition of absent(). But it turned out there's already CodeGen/attr-nodebug.c which is testing the codegen part, so I removed the definition.)
Hmmm looks like attr-nodebug.c could be more robust... I'll look at that in a bit. http://reviews.llvm.org/D10678 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
