In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10562#191981, @silvas wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10562#191408, @axw wrote: > > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10562#191307, @silvas wrote: > > > > > This is looking good. What is the ETA for getting packagers to update? It > > > would be nice if you could chase down a couple and alert them to this > > > change. Otherwise I fear that we will be keeping the pod file forever. > > > > > > As in my other reply, my intention is to set a date to remove the files, > > forcing packaging scripts to be updated. I'm not sure if that is acceptable > > practice, so would need guidance. I'll send an email to cfe-dev. I intend > > to send a patch for the Debian packaging, and I'll see if I can find the > > maintainers for other popular distros to let them know. > > > Maybe chime in on Hans' post `[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.7 release plan and call for > testers`. That's probably going to be the highest concentration of people > involved in packaging/releasing. I replied to a slightly older 3.7 release plan thread, and also to the package maintainers for Fedora (Adam) and SuSE (Ismail). So far only have heard back from Ismail, who said it's fine. It's a fairly trivial change, so IMO it would be fair to give until next week before assuming tacit approval, and removing the old stuff (which I've added to the diff), http://reviews.llvm.org/D10562 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
