arsenm added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10586#216803, @pekka.jaaskelainen wrote:
> Can you please clarify me a bit where the actual device is needed/used (ATM > only Kaveri) if the target is HSAIL, an "abstract machine"/IL? Just trying to > get my head around on how the Clang/LLVM will work for HSAIL. > > If it's for the extensions, why builtins-hsail.cl assumes gcn-specific > builtins are found in the output even though mcpu is not set in the test > command line? It's used for enabling extension and some performance hacks. kaveri enables gcn extensions, and disables a few things like negative offsets for addressing modes. http://reviews.llvm.org/D10586 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
