On Aug 19, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
I knew the general use. However, there is no break/continue in this
manufactured for-loop.
Thus the comment. I don't think we need it, unless there is some
implied assumption requiring them.
My apologies. My response was not relevant. I read too fast.
- Fariborz
- Thanks, Fariborz
On Aug 19, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Anders Carlsson wrote:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
+ // Store the blocks to use for break and continue.
+ // FIXME. Is this needed?
+ BreakContinueStack.push_back(BreakContinue(AfterFor,
ContinueBlock));
It's not needed. BreakContinueStack is used so we know where to
jump when generating break and continue statements.
+ // FIXME. Do we need this?
+ BreakContinueStack.pop_back();
Same here.
Anders
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
