On Aug 29, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Fariborz > Jahanian<[email protected]> wrote: >> > We have to build the node because otherwise, there isn't anywhere in > the AST for the initializers to live. In the dependent case, yes, we
Of course we need to build the initializer. Focus of the question is when we have dependent type initializers. > > could skip all analysis; if we did that, though, we would miss a class > of errors which could be detected earlier, specifically the case where > a member that requires an initializer doesn't have one. We don't need to skip the analysis. We just don't build BaseOrMemberInitializers if there is even one dependent case. - fariborz > > > -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
