Good catch, I'll add a check for that. On Sep 1, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Anders Carlsson wrote: >> Author: andersca >> Date: Tue Sep 1 13:33:46 2009 >> New Revision: 80701 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=80701&view=rev >> Log: >> We can generate constructors/destructors with base classes and non- >> trivial fields just fine now. > >> - // The class has base classes - we don't support that right now. >> - if (RD->getNumBases() > 0) >> - return false; > > getNumVBases() > 0? We don't yet do all the right things there yet... _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
