On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Author: ddunbar
> Date: Wed Sep 2 18:13:20 2009
> New Revision: 80848
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=80848&view=rev
> Log:
> Use a "production" clang binary in this build.
>
> Modified:
> cfe/tags/Apple/clang/clang/tools/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/tags/Apple/clang/clang/tools/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/tags/Apple/clang/clang/tools/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp?rev=80848&r1=80847&r2=80848&view=diff
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> --- cfe/tags/Apple/clang/clang/tools/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
> (original)
> +++ cfe/tags/Apple/clang/clang/tools/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp Wed
> Sep 2 18:13:20 2009
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
> using namespace clang;
>
> // Used to set values for "production" clang, for releases.
> -// #define USE_PRODUCTION_CLANG
> +#define USE_PRODUCTION_CLANG
>
> Driver::Driver(const char *_Name, const char *_Dir,
> const char *_DefaultHostTriple,
If that's all it took to make Clang production-quality, why the heck
did you wait so long?
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
