> This refactoring is fine. Eventually we're going to have to do something > smarter to find libstdc++, because the paths we're producing (both before > and after your patch) are some rather horrid guesswork.
True. I have two items in my TODO for includes. First is adding support searching for libstdc++ headers in a position relative to the clang binary, similar to what g++ does. This in useful when working with non-system compilers. Second in finding a way of not searching the paths of every supported system :-) > - Doug > Cheers, -- Rafael Ávila de Espíndola _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
