20 okt 2009 kl. 08.42 skrev Daniel Dunbar: > Hi Anders, > > Shouldn't the mangle functions just be methods on the MangleContext? I > think this simplifies things. >
Sure, that sounds like a good idea. > Once that is done it probably makes sense to make MangleContext an > abstract class and have CXXNameMangler be its concrete implementation. In what way would MangleContext be abstract? Would we make the mangle functions pure virtual? (That doesn't really make sense to me). Anders _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
