2009/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]>: >> I'm ambivalent about adding options which are needless clang specific, >> since we share the interface with gcc. Would it make sense to name >> this something more generic (which would make sense for gcc as well), >> e.g., -nobuiltininc? > > Using clang's preprocessor with gcc is kind of a clang specific feature :-)
Yes, but the feature isn't limited to that use case. > But I am fine with any option name. The attached patch converts clang > and clang-cc to your proposed -nobuiltininc. Thanks, I like that better. Please apply! It would also be good to document this in the man page. - Daniel _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
